The lost sheep, lost coin and prodigal son in Luke 15:18-32

The religious elite were angry with Jesus for spending time with tax-gatherers and sinners; after all, Scripture warned against spending time with ungodly people (Ps 1:1; Prov 13:20).  The difference, of course, is that Jesus is spending time with sinners to influence them for the kingdom, not to be shaped by their ways (Lk 15:1-2).

Jesus answered the religious elite by telling them three stories: the story of the lost sheep, the lost coin, and the lost son.  A hundred was roughly an average sized flock, and when one sheep strayed the shepherd would do whatever necessary to recover it.  (He could leave his other sheep with fellow shepherds who would watch over their flocks together with him.  Sheep would often roam together and be separated by their shepherds’ distinctive calls or flutes.)  When he finds what was lost, he calls his friends together to rejoice, and Jesus says it is the same way with God: those who are really his friends rejoice with him when he regains what was lost (15:3-7).  The implication seems to be that the religious elite are not God’s friends, or they would be rejoicing.

Jesus then turns to the story of the lost coin.  If a woman had ten coins as her dowry, the money she had brought into her marriage in case of divorce or widowhood, she was a very poor woman indeed: ten coins represented about ten days’ wages for the average working man.  In any case, one out of ten is more than one out of a hundred, and she is desperate to find the coin!  Most small, one-room Galilean homes had floors of roughly fitted stones, so coins and other objects routinely fell between the cracks and remained lost until excavated by modern archaeologists!  Further, most of these homes had at most one small window and a doorway, so there was little light to help her find her coin.  She thus lights a lamp, but in this period most lamps were small enough to hold in the palm of one’s hand, and these did not provide much light.  So she sweeps with a broom, hoping to hear it tinkle–and finally, she finds it!  Her friends rejoice with her, just as God’s friends rejoice with him–implying, again, that perhaps the religious elite are not among God’s friends (15:8-10).

Jesus then turns to the story of the lost son.  The younger son says to his father, “I want my share of the inheritance now.”  In that culture, the son was virtually declaring, “Father, I wish you were dead”–the epitome of disrespect.  The father was under no obigation to divide his inheritance, but he divided it anyway; the elder brother would have received two thirds and the younger one third.  Under ancient law, by dividing the inheritance the father simply was telling them which fields and items each would get after his decease; the son could not legally spend the estate before then.  But this son does it anyway; he flees to a far country and wastes his father’s years of work.  In the end, however, reduced to poverty, he has to feed pigs; for Jesus’ Jewish hearers, this was a fitting end for such a rebellious son, and a fitting end for the story.  If the young man were involved with pigs, he would be unclean and not even be able to approach fellow Jews for help!

But the young man decides that he would rather be a servant in his father’s house than starve, so he returns home to beg for mercy.  His father, seeing him a long way off, runs to meet him.  In that culture, it was considered undignified for older men to run, but this father discards his dignity; his son has come home!  The son tries to plead that he might be a slave, but the father ignores him, instead calling for the best robe in the house–undoubtedly his own; and a ring for the young man’s finger–undoubtedly a signet ring, symbolizing his reinstatement to sonship; and sandals for his feet–because most servants did not wear sandals, the father is saying, “No, I will not receive you as a servant!  I will receive you only as my son!”  The fatted calf was enough food to feed the entire village, so he throws a big party, and all his friends rejoice with him.

So far the story has paralleled the two stories that preceded it, but now Jesus goes further, challenging the religious elite more directly.  Ancient literature sometimes framed an important paragraph by starting and ending on the same statement, here that his lost son has come home (15:24, 32).  When the elder brother discovers that the father has welcomed home his younger brother, he has nothing to lose economically; the inheritance was already divided (15:12).  The problem is that he regards as unfair his father celebrating the return of a rebellious son when he himself needed no mercy; he thought himself good enough without his father’s mercy.  He protests to his father, refusing to greet him with a title, reducing the father to coming out and begging him to come in.  He is now disrespecting his father just as much as the younger brother had earlier!  “I have been serving you,” he protests (15:29), thereby revealing that he saw himself as a servant rather than a son–the very role the father refused to consider acceptable (15:21-22).

The religious elite despised the “sinners” who were coming to Jesus, not realizing that their hearts were no better.  The sinners were like the younger brother, the religious elite like the older one.  All of us need Jesus; none can be saved without God’s mercy.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Post

Let the dead bury the dead: the demands of discipleship in Luke 9:58-62

Next Post

Philip preaches to the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8:26-27

Related Posts